Campbell-Sevey, Inc. v. Pacific Ethanol Imperial, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Campbell-Sevey, Inc.
Defendant: Delta-T Corporation, Bateman Litwin N. V., Pacific Ethanol Imperial, LLC and Pacific Ethanol, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2008cv06284
Filed: December 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Noel
Presiding Judge: Rosenbaum
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 145 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 144 Report and Recommendation, 121 Motion for Entry of Judgment filed by Campbell-Sevey, Inc. Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Under Rule 54(b) (Doc. No. 121 ) is GRANTED as follows : 1. The Court enters final judgment under Rule 54(b) against Bateman for its Guaranty of $646,998.73 owed by Delta-T under the Payment Agreement. 2. The Court enters final judgment under Rule 54(b) against Bateman for its Guaranty of for $ 38,280.00 owed by Delta-T for extra service hours. 3. The Court enters final judgment under Rule 54(b) against Bateman for its Guaranty of $168,896.60 owed by Delta-T in interest under the Payment Agreement. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 8/2/2010. (BJS)
April 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER ADOPTING 111 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 78 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Campbell-Sevey, Inc., 56 Motion to Sever, Motion to Transfer filed by Bateman Litwin N. V., Delta-T Corporation, 38 Motion to Dismiss filed by Pacific E thanol Imperial, LLC, Pacific Ethanol, Inc. (Written Opinion). Motion to Dismiss 38 is granted; Motion to sever or transfer 56 is denied; Motion for summary judgment 78 is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge James M. Rosenbaum on 04/02/2010.(kmc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Campbell-Sevey, Inc. v. Pacific Ethanol Imperial, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Delta-T Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bateman Litwin N. V.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Ethanol Imperial, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Ethanol, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Campbell-Sevey, Inc.
Represented By: John H Strothman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?