Sierra Club et al v. Clinton et al
| Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, Sierra Club, Indigenous Environmental Network and National Wildlife Federation |
| Tom Tidwell, Rob Harper, United States Army Corps of Engineers, James Steinberg, United States Department of State, Robert L. Van Antwerp, United States Forest Service, Hillary Clinton and Jon L. Christensen |
| Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership |
| 0:2009cv02622 |
| September 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Erickson |
| Kyle |
| Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
252
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 214 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 223 Motion to Strike ; granting 226 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 232 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 241 Motion for Leave to File. See Order for details. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 10/19/2010. (BJS)
|
|
Filing
185
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 1. Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 73 ) and Enbridge's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 88 ) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. Plaintiffs' Fifth and Sixth Claims for Relief are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. b. As to Plaintiffs' First through Fourth Claims for Relief, Defendants' motions are DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 2/24/2010. (BJS)
|
|
Filing
183
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 1. Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 91 ) is DENIED. 2. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction to Conform to Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 125 ) is GRANTED. See order for details. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 2/3/2010. (BJS)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER setting briefing schedule on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction re 66 Stipulation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 10/06/09. (kll)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER that all proceedings before Judge Kyle (motions, trial, etc.) will be held in the U.S. Courthouse in Fergus Falls, Minnesota. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 10/05/09. (kll)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE AND TRANSFERRING ACTION TO DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA re 44 (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2009) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/29/2009.]
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER continuing motion and allowing phone appearance. (counsel shall provide the direct dial number to the court clerk) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2009) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/29/2009.]
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER GRANTING ENBRIDGE ENERGY, LP'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO INTERVENE and GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE OVERSIZED BRIEFS 17 , 39 (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2009) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/29/2009.]
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON QUESTIONS CONCERNING VENUE: defendants motion to transfer venue and memorandum is due 9/14/09, plaintiff's optional opposition is due 9/21/09, defendants reply is due 9/23/9 , hearing is set for 9/25/09 at 9:00 am. Plaintiff's motion for TRO is denied, plaintiff's motion for preliminaly induction is deferred pending further briefing. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2009)[Transferred from California Northern on 9/29/2009.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
