Moran v. Lurcat, LLC
Plaintiff: Keith Moran
Defendant: D'Amico & Partners, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2010cv03031
Filed: July 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER FOR FINAL JUDGMENT(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on November 16, 2011. (slf)
July 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 21 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 21, 2011. (slf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moran v. Lurcat, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Moran
Represented By: Thomas J Lyons, Sr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D'Amico & Partners, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?