Snowden v. Time Safe, Inc. et al
||Robert Vincent Snowden, Jr.
||Time Safe, Inc., Timothy Duke Armstrong, Gary Charley and Thomas McInerny
||November 10, 2010
||Minnesota District Court
||XX US, Outside State
||Joan N. Ericksen
||Jeanne J. Graham
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 3, 2012
ORDER : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Plaintiffs Motion to Enforce Settlement, for Attorneys Fees, and for an Order to Show Cause why Defendants are not in Contempt [Docket No. 58] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:a.Defendants shall produce a ny other existing documentation that may subsequently be needed to effectively carry out the terms of the agreement to Defendant Charley, with full access by Plaintiff, within seven days of the date of this Order.b.Plaintiffs Request for attorneys fe es and a finding of contempt is DENIED with leave to renew in the event Defendants do not produce the said documentation as ordered. Further, should the documentation not be furnished as ordered, this case will be re-opened, placed on the Courts docket and scheduled for trial on the issues presently before the Court.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on Jully 3, 2012. (slf)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.