Scott v. Vermillion State Bank
Appellant: Bruce Eugene Scott
Appellee: Vermillion State Bank
Case Number: 0:2011cv00229
Filed: January 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Le Suer
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Boylan
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Magnuson
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The Order for Judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota is AFFIRMED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 3/28/11. (LPH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Vermillion State Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Bruce Eugene Scott
Represented By: Bruce E Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Vermillion State Bank
Represented By: Michael J Iannacone, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?