Tata AIG General Insurance Company v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Tata AIG General Insurance Company
Defendant: C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and C.H. Robinson International, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2011cv01633
Filed: June 22, 2011
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: XX Outside US
Referring Judge: Arthur J. Boylan
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tata AIG General Insurance Company v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tata AIG General Insurance Company
Represented By: Steven J Weintraut
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey A Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C.H. Robinson International, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey A Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.