TattleTale Portable Alarm Systems, Inc. v. Calfee, Halter & Griswold, LLP, et al

Plaintiff: TattleTale Portable Alarm Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Calfee, Halter & Griswold, LLP
Movant: RSI Video Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2011mc00069
Filed: September 9, 2011
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Jeanne J. Graham
Presiding Judge: Richard H. Kyle
Nature of Suit: Other
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TattleTale Portable Alarm Systems, Inc. v. Calfee, Halter & Griswold, LLP, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TattleTale Portable Alarm Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Calfee, Halter & Griswold, LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: RSI Video Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Donald G Heeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.