Barton v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
| Kate Barton |
| Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. |
| 0:2012cv00162 |
| January 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Washington |
| Michael J. Davis |
| Jeanne J. Graham |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment 70 is DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 10/25/13. (GRR)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC's Motion to Dismiss 4 is GRANTED in part and DENIED and Defendant Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for S ummary Judgment 14 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: Count II, as against Saxon, is dismissed, and as against Ocwen is limited, as set forth in this Memorandum Opinion; Count III is dismissed in its entirety; Count VI is dismiss ed in its entirety to the extent such count is based on § 524, and to the extent this count is based on § 362, it is dismissed as against Saxon and limited as against Ocwen as set forth in this Memorandum Opinion. With respect to the remaining claims, the motions are denied.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/26/12. (GRR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
