McLaughlin v. Children's Safety Centers et al
| Teri Walker McLaughlin |
| Children's Safety Centers, Genesis II, FamilyWise Services and Richard Bents |
| 0:2012cv01746 |
| July 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Ramsey |
| Jeanne J. Graham |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER : 1. Defendant CSC's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6] Counts I and V of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint alleging sexual harassment under the MHRA and Title VII is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. Defendant CSC's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6] Counts III and IV of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint alleging violations of the Minnesota Whistleblower Act is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. Defendant CSC's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6] Count VII of Plaintiff& #039;s Amended Complaint alleging a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE; 4. Defendant CSC's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6] Counts II and VI of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint alleging reprisal and retaliation under the MHR A and Title VII is DENIED; and 5. Defendant Bents' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 12] Count VIII of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint alleging claims of assault and battery against him individually is DENIED (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 2/8/13. (LPH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
