United States of America v. $9,012.04 In U.S. Currency et al

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $9,012.04 In U.S. Currency and $2,000.00 In Silver Coins and Certificates, and Miscellaneous Firearms
Case Number: 0:2012mc00076
Filed: October 17, 2012
Court: Minnesota District Court
County: Hennepin
Referring Judge: Jeffrey J. Keyes
Presiding Judge: Richard H. Kyle
Nature of Suit: Miscellaneous civil case

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $9,012.04 In U.S. Currency et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Erika R Mozangue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $9,012.04 In U.S. Currency
Represented By: Donna Rae Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $2,000.00 In Silver Coins and Certificates, and Miscellaneous Firearms
Represented By: Donna Rae Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.