UBS Financial Services Inc. v. Christenson

Plaintiff: UBS Financial Services Inc.
Defendant: Tyler Christenson
Case Number: 0:2013cv01081
Filed: May 8, 2013
Court: Minnesota District Court
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Referring Judge: Janie S. Mayeron
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 15, 2013 27 Opinion or Order of the Court PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiff's Request for Expedited Hearing on Emergency Injunctive Relief Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d) 7 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/15/13. (GRR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UBS Financial Services Inc. v. Christenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UBS Financial Services Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey S Storms
Represented By: Michael T Roche
Represented By: Robert Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyler Christenson
Represented By: Livia E Babcock
Represented By: Laura C Sands
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.