Thomas v. Dooley

Respondent: Becky Dooley
Petitioner: Milton Thomas
Case Number: 0:2013cv01143
Filed: May 13, 2013
Court: Minnesota District Court
County: Carlton
Referring Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 19, 2013 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated May 16, 2013 8 . 2.Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus 1 is DENIED. 3.Petitioner& #039;s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 and 3 is DENIED.4.This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 5.Petitioner is NOT granted a Certificate of Appealability. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/18/13. (GRR)(cc: Milton Thomas) Modified on 7/19/2013 (akl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Dooley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Becky Dooley
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Milton Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.