Abdullahi v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner: Mahad Hussein Abdullahi
Respondent: U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Case Number: 0:2013cv01280
Filed: May 29, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: Carver
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Presiding Judge: Janie S. Mayeron
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 . (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on March 20, 2014. (CBC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abdullahi v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mahad Hussein Abdullahi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Gregory G Brooker
Represented By: Erika R Mozangue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?