Pliscott v. Colvin et al
Plaintiff: Kristina Pliscott
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 0:2013cv01390
Filed: June 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: Chisago
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Boylan
Presiding Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER re 26 Request filed by Kristina Pliscott (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 09/23/14. (SMD)
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting 4 Motion to Dismiss/General; adopting 15 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 08/13/14. (SMD) cc: Kristina Pliscott on 08/13/2014. Modified text on 8/13/2014 (MMP).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pliscott v. Colvin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristina Pliscott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?