Rosillo v. Holten et al

Plaintiff: Alfredo Rosillo
Defendant: Jeff Ellis and Matt Holten
Case Number: 0:2013cv01940
Filed: July 19, 2013
Court: Minnesota District Court
County: Mower
Referring Judge: Steven E. Rau
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 23, 2014 33 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: Defendant Holten's Motion for Summary Judgment 17 is GRANTED. Defendant Holten is DISMISSED from this action. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on December 23, 2014. (CBC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosillo v. Holten et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alfredo Rosillo
Represented By: Duane A Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff Ellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matt Holten
Represented By: Daniel P Kurtz
Represented By: Anna L. Yunker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.