Scott v. Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff: Jimmy D. Scott
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 0:2013cv03637
Filed: December 27, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Ramsey
Presiding Judge: Janie S. Mayeron
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: IRS-Third Party
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 6011
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Report and Recommendation, 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Jimmy D. Scott (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on July 22, 2014. (HAZ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmy D. Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?