Scott v. Internal Revenue Service
Jimmy D. Scott |
Internal Revenue Service |
0:2013cv03637 |
December 27, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Ramsey |
Janie S. Mayeron |
John R. Tunheim |
IRS-Third Party |
26 U.S.C. ยง 6011 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Report and Recommendation, 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Jimmy D. Scott (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on July 22, 2014. (HAZ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Scott v. Internal Revenue Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jimmy D. Scott | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.