Osco Motors Company, LLC et al v. Quality Mark, Inc.
| Osco Motors Company, LLC and Engine Distributors, Inc. |
| Quality Mark, Inc. |
| 0:2014cv00887 |
| March 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael J. Davis |
| Jeffrey J. Keyes |
| Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0010 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner Engine Distributors, Inc. and Osco Motors Company, LLC d/b/a Osco Motors Corporation's Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award 2 is DENIED; 2. Respondent Quality Mark, Inc.&# 039;s Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and for Interests and Costs 26 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: a. Respondent Quality Mark's motion to confirm arbitration award is GRANTED; b. The March 11, 2014 award of the to oling and $302,052 entered by the American Arbitration Association's Commercial Arbitration Tribunal 28 , Ex. A] is CONFIRMED; c. The Court DENIES Respondent Quality Mark, Inc.'s request for attorney's fees; and d. Judgment s hall be entered by separate document providing that judgment in the amount of $302,052 is hereby entered in favor of Respondent Quality Mark, Inc., plus post-award, pre-judgment interest at a rate of 8% from March 11, 2014 to the date of this judgment.LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 8/21/14. (GRR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
