Hawes v. Grandlienard

Respondent: Kent Grandlienard
Petitioner: Andrew Thomas Hawes
Case Number: 0:2014cv00889
Filed: March 31, 2014
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Washington
Referring Judge: Janie S. Mayeron
Presiding Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 12, 2014 12 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. This action is summarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. Petitioner is NOT granted a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 5/12/2014. (LDB) cc: Hawes on 5/12/2014 (JAM).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hawes v. Grandlienard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kent Grandlienard
Represented By: Marcy S Crain
Represented By: James B Early
Represented By: Matthew Frank(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andrew Thomas Hawes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.