State of Minnesota v. Willis

State of Minnesota v. Willis

Plaintiff:	State of Minnesota
Defendant:	Berry A. Willis
Case Number:	0:2014cv04917
Filed:	December 3, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Hennepin
Presiding Judge:	Donovan W. Frank
Presiding Judge:	Jeffrey J. Keyes
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 11, 2015	Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Defendant Berry Willis's objections (Doc. No. 19 ) to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes's December 15, 2014 Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED. 2. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes's December 15, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14 ) is ADOPTED. 3. Defendant Berry A. Willis's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2 ) is DENIED.4. Willis's application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. No . 10 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature. 5. Willis's notice of removal (Doc. No. 1 ) is VACATED. 6. This action is REMANDED to Minnesota District Court, Fourth Judicial District. 7. Willis is restricted from removing any state proceedi ngs to federal court unless he is represented by counsel or receives prior written authorization from a judicial officer in this District Court. 8. Willis's Motion to Remove Judicial Officer, Jeffrey J. Keyes, Due to Fraud upon the District Courts (Doc. No. 17 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 2/11/2015. (BJS)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 11, 2015

Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Defendant Berry Willis's objections (Doc. No. 19 ) to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes's December 15, 2014 Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED. 2. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes's December 15, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14 ) is ADOPTED. 3. Defendant Berry A. Willis's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2 ) is DENIED.4. Willis's application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. No . 10 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature. 5. Willis's notice of removal (Doc. No. 1 ) is VACATED. 6. This action is REMANDED to Minnesota District Court, Fourth Judicial District. 7. Willis is restricted from removing any state proceedi ngs to federal court unless he is represented by counsel or receives prior written authorization from a judicial officer in this District Court. 8. Willis's Motion to Remove Judicial Officer, Jeffrey J. Keyes, Due to Fraud upon the District Courts (Doc. No. 17 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 2/11/2015. (BJS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: State of Minnesota v. Willis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: State of Minnesota
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Berry A. Willis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?