Loudner v. Wilson
Royce Gregory Loudner |
Denese Wilson |
0:2014cv04926 |
December 4, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Pine |
Steven E. Rau |
Paul A. Magnuson |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: 1. Adopting the Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge 2 ; 2. Denying Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus 1 ; and 3. This case is summarily DISMISSED without prejudice. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 01/13/2015. (LLM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Loudner v. Wilson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Royce Gregory Loudner | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Denese Wilson | |
Represented By: | Ana H Voss |
Represented By: | D Gerald Wilhelm |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.