Wattleton v. Davis
Plaintiff: David Earl Wattleton
Defendant: Brian K. Davis
Case Number: 0:2014cv05003
Filed: December 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Olmsted
Presiding Judge: Steven E. Rau
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re Report and Recommendation 5 : Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Docket No. 2 ] is DENIED. This action is SUMMARILY DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on January 27, 2015. (CBC) (cc: Wattleton) Modified text on 1/27/2015 (ALM).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wattleton v. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Earl Wattleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian K. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?