Scarborough v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company
Jonathan Scarborough |
Federated Mutual Insurance Company |
0:2015cv01633 |
March 30, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Steele |
Donovan W. Frank |
Franklin L. Noel |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 129 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Defendant Federated's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 123 ) is GRANTED.(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 3/29/2019. (las) |
Filing 88 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 1. Defendant Federated Mutual Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 77 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: a. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to Count I of Plaintiff 9;s Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 38 ). Therefore, Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. b. Defendants Motion is GRANTED as to Defendants Counterclaim (Doc. No. 76 ), subject to the parties' submission as to the reasonableness of the attorney fees and a finding by the Court that the attorney fees are reasonable. 2. Within thirty (30) days of this Order, the parties will submit briefing and other documentation to demonstrating why Defendant's requested attorney fees are or are not reasonable. The briefing shall not exceed five (5) pages. The Court reserves the right to hold a hearing on the issue. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 2/1/2017. (BJS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.