Frost v. Nicklin
Petitioner: Coquette April Frost
Respondent: Julie Nicklin
Case Number: 0:2015cv01635
Filed: March 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Waseca
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Presiding Judge: Becky R. Thorson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Frost's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Docket No. 1 ] is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and Frost's motion for appointment of counsel [Docket No. 2 ] is DENIED as moot. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on May 27, 2015. (CBC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frost v. Nicklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Coquette April Frost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Julie Nicklin
Represented By: Ana H Voss
Represented By: D Gerald Wilhelm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?