Marvin Lumber & Cedar Company v. Severson

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Minnesota District Court Marvin Lumber & Cedar Company v. Severson

Marvin Lumber & Cedar Company v. Severson

Plaintiff:	Marvin Lumber & Cedar Company
Defendant:	Len Severson
Case Number:	0:2015cv01869
Filed:	April 3, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Roseau
Presiding Judge:	Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Davis
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 28, 2015	Filing 55 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated July 7, 2015 37 . 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 9 , is GRANTED IN PART and DEN IED IN PART, as follows: a. Defendant is preliminarily enjoined from using and/or disclosing any trade secret or confidential information Defendant acquired as a result of his employment with Plaintiff; b. Through August 13, 2016, Defendant is pr eliminarily enjoined from directly or indirectly soliciting business from Marvin's dealers or Marvin's dealers customers with whom Defendant worked during his employment at Marvin; and c. Defendant is permitted to continue working as VerH alen's general manager, except for direct management of VerHalens commercial window sales. 3. The Court concludes that, as Defendant has stipulated to the terms of the preliminary injunction, no security is required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c). (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/28/15. (GRR)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 28, 2015

Filing 55 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated July 7, 2015 37 . 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 9 , is GRANTED IN PART and DEN IED IN PART, as follows: a. Defendant is preliminarily enjoined from using and/or disclosing any trade secret or confidential information Defendant acquired as a result of his employment with Plaintiff; b. Through August 13, 2016, Defendant is pr eliminarily enjoined from directly or indirectly soliciting business from Marvin's dealers or Marvin's dealers customers with whom Defendant worked during his employment at Marvin; and c. Defendant is permitted to continue working as VerH alen's general manager, except for direct management of VerHalens commercial window sales. 3. The Court concludes that, as Defendant has stipulated to the terms of the preliminary injunction, no security is required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c). (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/28/15. (GRR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marvin Lumber & Cedar Company v. Severson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marvin Lumber & Cedar Company
Represented By:	Tracey Holmes Donesky
Represented By:	Daniel Oberdorfer
Represented By:	Kristin Berger Parker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Len Severson
Represented By:	Joel P Schroeder
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?