United States of America v. Lorenzo-Perez

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Minnesota District Court United States of America v. Lorenzo-Perez

United States of America v. Lorenzo-Perez

Petitioner:	United States of America
Respondent:	Thomas Lorenzo-Perez
Case Number:	0:2015cv02063
Filed:	April 20, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Olmsted
Presiding Judge:	Donovan W. Frank
Presiding Judge:	Jeffrey J. Keyes
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	18 U.S.C. § 4246
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 25, 2015	Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Respondent Thomas Lorenzo-Perezs objections (Doc. No. 16 ) to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyess August 11, 2015 Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED.2. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes' August 1 1, 2015 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14 ) is ADOPTED. 3. The Government's Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of an Imprisoned Person Under 18 U.S.C. § 4245 (Doc. No. 1 ) is GRANTED based on findings that: (a) Respondent suffers from a mental disease or defect; (b) Respondent is in need of custody for care or treatment of that mental disease or defect; and (c) FMC Rochester is a suitable facility for such care and treatment. 4. Respondent shall be committed to the c ustody of the United States Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4245 for hospitalization and treatment until Respondent is no longer in need of such custody for care and treatment.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 9/25/2015. (BJS)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 25, 2015

Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Respondent Thomas Lorenzo-Perezs objections (Doc. No. 16 ) to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyess August 11, 2015 Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED.2. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes' August 1 1, 2015 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14 ) is ADOPTED. 3. The Government's Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of an Imprisoned Person Under 18 U.S.C. § 4245 (Doc. No. 1 ) is GRANTED based on findings that: (a) Respondent suffers from a mental disease or defect; (b) Respondent is in need of custody for care or treatment of that mental disease or defect; and (c) FMC Rochester is a suitable facility for such care and treatment. 4. Respondent shall be committed to the c ustody of the United States Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4245 for hospitalization and treatment until Respondent is no longer in need of such custody for care and treatment.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 9/25/2015. (BJS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Lorenzo-Perez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: United States of America
Represented By:	Craig R Baune
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Thomas Lorenzo-Perez
Represented By:	Katherine Menendez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?