Hansen v. Rios
Petitioner: Randal Kent Hansen
Respondent: Warden M. Rios
Case Number: 0:2019cv00374
Filed: February 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Tony N Leung
Referring Judge: John R Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2019 Filing 7 RECEIPT number 44641102767 in the amount of $5.00 issued to Randal Kent Hansen. (Attachments: #1 cover letter for receipt)(MMP)
March 28, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE COURT by Randal Kent Hansen re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Envelope)(MMP) Document QC'd by KMH on 4/4/2019 (KMH).
March 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT.1. The Clerk of Court shall provide a copy of the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form), Form No. AO 239, and accompanying Certificate of Authorized Prison Official to Hansen.2. Within 30 days from the date of this Order, Hansen must file the completed Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form), Form No. AO 239, or a document containing comparable information, accompanied by the institutional certification. Alternatively, Hansen may pay the $5.00 filing fee.3. If Hansen does not provide the financial information and institutional certification or pay the $5.00 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this Order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 3/27/2019. (EB) cc:Randal Kent Hansen. Modified text on 3/27/2019 (MMG).
March 7, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin M Secord on behalf of M. Rios. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Secord, Erin)
February 14, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Immediate Release (Via Second Change Act of 2007 (34 USC 60541(g) As Amended By The First Step Act of 2018) Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 USC 2241 filed by Randal Kent Hansen. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(MMP) Document QC'd by KMH on 2/20/19 (KMH).
February 14, 2019 Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Randal Kent Hansen. (MMP) Document QC'd by KMH on 2/20/19 (KMH).
February 14, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Randal Kent Hansen. No summons requested. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per 5th Division Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Envelope) cc: Hansen (MMP) Document QC'd by KMH on 2/20/19 (KMH).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hansen v. Rios
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden M. Rios
Represented By: Ana H Voss
Represented By: Ann M Bildtsen
Represented By: Erin M Secord
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Randal Kent Hansen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?