Roehning v. United States of America
| Justin Bradley Roehning |
| United States and United States of America |
| 0:2022cv00823 |
| April 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Ana H Voss on behalf of United States of America. (Voss, Ana)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Justin Bradley Roehning. United States of America served on 4/14/2022, answer due 5/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Torgerson, Lynne)
|
|
Filing 4
(Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 22-cv-823 (PJS/TNL). (MMP)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Justin Bradley Roehning re #1 Complaint, #2 Notice of Appearance Certificate of Service (Torgerson, Lynne)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Lynne A Torgerson on behalf of Justin Bradley Roehning. (Torgerson, Lynne)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Complaint Declaratory Judgment against United States (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9428249) filed by Justin Bradley Roehning. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Torgerson, Lynne)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
