Woods v. Hays et al
Darrell Woods |
Ricky Hays, Tyree Butler, Kristin Cutt, Richard Griggs, William Jones, James Hurley, James Rhodes, Taylor Preston, Damien Austin, Tina Cobb, Alan Earls and Unknown Grote |
2:2015cv00013 |
February 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Hannibal Office |
Pike |
Catherine D. Perry |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [Doc. # 76 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $33.10 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 5/8/2018. (CBL) |
Filing 75 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall either pay the $505 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintif f submits a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, he must also submit a certified copy of his prison account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his notice of appeal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mai l plaintiff a copy of the Court's form "Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Cost." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will deny in forma pauperis status. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on April 19, 2018. (MCB)(Memorandum and Order and form sent to plaintiff this date.) |
Filing 67 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 54 is granted as to plaintiff Darrell Woods' Eighth Amendment claims of excessive force and sexual assault, and his First Amendme nt claims of retaliation, and these claims are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Woods' remaining state law claims of negligence are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). An appropriate Judgment is entered herewith. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 3/19/2018. (CBL) |
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Darrell Woods' Motion to Compel 30 is denied as moot. Woods' alternative request for sanctions is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Darrell Woods' Motion for Appointment of Counsel 32 is denied without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 3/28/16. (EAB) |
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $18 no later than September 1, 2015. No extensions will be granted. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on August 11, 2015. (MCB) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [ECF No. 7 ] is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 8/5/2015. (CBL) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants Kristin Cutt, Tyree Butler, Tina Cobb, Stacie Lescalleet, and Taylor Preston. IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants Kristin Cutt, Tyree Butler, Tina Cobb, Stacie Lescalleet, and Taylor Preston shall reply to plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Ricky Hays, Richard Griggs, William Jones, James Hurley, James Rhodes, Damien Austin, Alan Earls, Unknown Grote, David Cutt, and Robert Lagore are DISMISSED without p rejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's due process claims are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court's Order dated April 20, 2015, is VACATED in part; plaintiff is not required to pay an initial partial filing fee at this time. Plaintiff must submit a certified copy of his prison account statement within forty-five (45) days of this Order. An Order of Partial Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 06/10/2015. (CBL) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $12.00 within thirty (30) days of the d ate of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittanc e is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's prisoner civil rights complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of this Order or face dismissal of this action. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on April 20, 2015. (MCB)(Plaintiff was mailed the Memorandum and Order along with the Court's prisoner civil rights complaint form with date.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.