United States of America v. Vanderpool

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Western District United States of America v. Vanderpool

United States of America v. Vanderpool

Plaintiff:	United States of America
Respondent:	Dell Vanderpool
Case Number:	2:2013mc09003
Filed:	February 12, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office:	Jefferson City Office
County:	Boone
Presiding Judge:	Matt J. Whitworth
Presiding Judge:	Fernando J. Gaitan
Nature of Suit:	Miscellaneous Case - Use ONLY when filing a misc (MC) case
Cause of Action:	26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 17, 2014	Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Matt J. Whitworth, 31 . The United States' Motion for Order of Civil Contempt and Issue of Writ of Body Attachment, 18 , is granted. Order mailed via regular mail to Mr. Vanderpool. (Cross, Ashley) Modified on 12/17/2014 - mailed certified Cert# 7012 3460 0001 9028 2098 (Russel, Jeri).
December 23, 2013	Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 . Petitioner's petition to enforce IRS summons is granted; and the respondent, Dell Vanderpool, directed to obey summons issued to him on November 13, 2012, not later than thirty days after service of this order on respondent. Clerk mailed a copy of this order via regular and certified mail to respondent at 9051 North Reams Rd, Centralia, MO 65240 (certified mail article #7001 0360 0003 3497 7877). Signed on 12/23/13 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda) Modified on 12/23/2013 (Lock, Tania).

Date Filed

Document Text

December 17, 2014

Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Matt J. Whitworth, 31 . The United States' Motion for Order of Civil Contempt and Issue of Writ of Body Attachment, 18 , is granted. Order mailed via regular mail to Mr. Vanderpool. (Cross, Ashley) Modified on 12/17/2014 - mailed certified Cert# 7012 3460 0001 9028 2098 (Russel, Jeri).

December 23, 2013

Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 . Petitioner's petition to enforce IRS summons is granted; and the respondent, Dell Vanderpool, directed to obey summons issued to him on November 13, 2012, not later than thirty days after service of this order on respondent. Clerk mailed a copy of this order via regular and certified mail to respondent at 9051 North Reams Rd, Centralia, MO 65240 (certified mail article #7001 0360 0003 3497 7877). Signed on 12/23/13 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda) Modified on 12/23/2013 (Lock, Tania).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Vanderpool
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By:	Lauren Kummerer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Dell Vanderpool
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?