US District Court for the Western District of Missouri

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 44,130
Ramirez v. Menard Inc.
as 2:2024cv04039
Plaintiff: Angela Ramirez
Defendant: Menard Inc. doing business as Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hercules Flores et al v. City of Independence, Missouri
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff: Elvia C Hercules Flores and Mauricio A. Guerra Guillen
Defendant: City of Independence, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Vishnani v. City of Independence, Missouri
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff: Shiraj Vishnani and Salima Vishani
Defendant: City of Independence, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dees v. Kijakazi
as 6:2024cv03075
Plaintiff: Danny Joe Dees
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Peck v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03074
Plaintiff: Louise Ann Peck
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
USA v. Morris
as 6:2024cv03072
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Kendell Morris
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Contego Spa Designs, Inc. v. Soho Nails Spa LLC
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff: Contego Spa Designs, Inc.
Defendant: Soho Nails Spa LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03070
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Monnig et al v. River Ridge Equipment, LLLP
as 2:2024cv04038
Plaintiff: Eric Monnig and Dan Monnig
Defendant: River Ridge Equipment, LLLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?