Jones v. State of Missouri et al
| Darryl Lynn Jones |
| State of Missouri, Joni Nadine Stewart and Support Kids Services, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv04087 |
| March 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jefferson City Office |
| Unknown |
| Nanette K. Laughrey |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER. Plaintiff Jones is ordered to pay Defendant Stewart attorney fees in the amount of $4,815.64. Signed on 2/10/15 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Order mailed to Darryl Lynn Jones) (Matthes, Renea)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Defendant Stewart's motion for Rule 11 sanctions against Plaintiff Jones [Doc. 48] is granted. Stewart shall file a statement of reasonable fees and costs within 14 days of the date of this Order. A copy of this Order was mailed to Jones.(Barragan-Scott, Alana)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER. Defendants Joni Nadine Stewart and Supportkids Services, Inc.'s motions to dismiss, Docs. 31 and 36, are granted. Signed on 10/20/14 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Matthes, Renea)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Defendant State of Missouri's motion to dismiss [Doc. 16] is granted. (Barragan-Scott, Alana) Modified on 9/16/2014 (Barragan-Scott, Alana). A copy of the Order was mailed to the Plaintiff. Modified on 9/16/2014 (Barragan-Scott, Alana).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
