Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. Dean Hathman Masonry Company, LLC d/b/a Dean Hathman Masonry Co.
| Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund, Construction Industry Laborers Welfare Fund, Patrick R. Pryor, Steve Schrimpf, Perri L. Pryor and Steven C. Glenn |
| Dean Hathman Masonry Company, LLC |
| 2:2014cv04093 |
| April 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jefferson City Office |
| Jackson |
| Matt J. Whitworth |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1362 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Plaintiffs-Garnishors' motion for payment of garnishment proceeds [doc. 16], to which no opposition was filed, is GRANTED. (Barragan-Scott, Alana)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting 4 motion for default judgment. Signed on 9/8/14 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Matthes, Renea)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Defendant Dean Hathman Masonry Company, LLC shall show cause in writing, on or before August 20, 2014, why the Plaintiffs' motions for entry of default and default judgment [Docs. 4 and 6] should not be granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Show Cause by regular and certified mail to Dean Hathman, Registered Agent, 7500 E. Richland Road, Columbia, Missouri 65201. (Barragan-Scott, Alana)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
