H&R Block Tax Services LLC v. Haworth
Plaintiff: H&R Block Tax Services LLC
Defendant: Dale E. Haworth
Case Number: 4:2015cv00211
Filed: March 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Stephen R. Bough
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER Granting 17 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed on 09/22/15 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Copy mailed to: Hector Bustos, Law Office of Ramon Garcia, 222 W. University Drive, Edinburg, TX 78539 and Dale Haworth, 2413 E. Griffin Parkway, Mission, Texas 78572.(Amos, Gloria)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: H&R Block Tax Services LLC v. Haworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: H&R Block Tax Services LLC
Represented By: Anthony J. Durone
Represented By: Stacey R. Gilman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dale E. Haworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?