Spight v. Caterpillar, Inc. et al
Spight and Lakeitra Diane Spight |
Caterpillar, Inc, David Hearns, Caterpillar, Inc., Karen Woods and Caterpillar, Inc. doing business as Progress Rail Services Corporation |
4:2016cv00340 |
April 15, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Kansas City Office |
Jackson |
Ortrie D Smith |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 Order of Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed on 8/31/16 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Matthes Mitra, Renea) |
Filing 25 STIPULATION of dismissal with prejudice by Lakeitra Diane Spight. (Lunceford, David) |
Filing 24 PROTECTIVE ORDER, #20 . Signed on 7/6/16 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Matthes, Renea) |
Filing 23 RULES OF TRIAL. Signed on 7/6/16 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (O'Connor, Stacy) |
Filing 22 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 11/28/2016. Pretrial Conference set for 4/21/2017 at 10:00 AM in Chambers before District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. Jury Trial set for 6/19/2017 at 8:00 AM in Courtroom 8C, Kansas City (ODS) before District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. Dispositive Motions due by 12/28/2016. Signed on 7/6/16 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (O'Connor, Stacy) |
Filing 21 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by AnnRene Sarah Braun on behalf of Defendants Caterpillar, Inc., David Hearns, Karen Woods.(Braun, AnnRene) |
Filing 20 Joint MOTION for protective order filed by Stacy M Bunck on behalf of All Defendants. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/22/2016 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Bunck, Stacy) |
Filing 19 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Caterpillar, Inc., David Hearns, Karen Woods. (Bunck, Stacy) |
Filing 18 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE A PROPOSED JOINT SCHEDULING ORDER, #15 . Signed on 6/24/16 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Matthes, Renea) |
Filing 17 ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND, #11 . Signed on 6/24/16 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Matthes, Renea) |
Filing 16 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER with Plaintiff's Objections by Lakeitra Diane Spight. (Lunceford, David) |
Filing 15 MOTION to stay Rule 26 Disclosures filed by David A Lunceford on behalf of Lakeitra Diane Spight. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/1/2016 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Lunceford, David) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by David Hearns submitting First Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents to Plaintiff filed by Stacy M Bunck on behalf of Defendant David Hearns.(Bunck, Stacy) |
Filing 13 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #11 MOTION to remand filed by Stacy M Bunck on behalf of Defendants Caterpillar, Inc., David Hearns, Karen Woods. Reply suggestions due by 6/20/2016 unless otherwise directed by the court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) #11 ) (Bunck, Stacy) |
Filing 12 SUGGESTIONS in support re #11 MOTION to remand filed by David A Lunceford on behalf of Plaintiff Lakeitra Diane Spight. (Related document(s) #11 ) (Lunceford, David) |
Filing 11 MOTION to remand filed by David A Lunceford on behalf of Lakeitra Diane Spight. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/3/2016 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Lunceford, David) |
Filing 10 AMENDED NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Larsen. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Melvin, Greg) |
Filing 9 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Stacy M Bunck on behalf of Defendant Caterpillar, Inc..(Bunck, Stacy) |
Filing 8 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint Petition on behalf of Caterpillar, Inc., David Hearns, Karen Woods.(Bunck, Stacy) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 8/15/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6D, Kansas City (REL) before Magistrate Judge Robert E. Larsen. Confidential settlement statements due by 8/11/2016. Signed on 4/20/16 by Magistrate Judge Robert E. Larsen. (Wilson, Carol) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Caterpillar, Inc., David Hearns, Karen Woods. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Bunck, Stacy) |
Filing 5 Rule 16 Notice. Proposed scheduling order due by 6/14/2016. Rule 26 conference due by 5/31/2016. Corporate disclosures due by 5/3/16. Signed on 4/18/16 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (O'Connor, Stacy) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.Show Cause Response due by 5/2/2016. Signed on 4/18/16 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Matthes, Renea) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Larsen. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Melvin, Greg) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of filing of Notice of Removal with State Court by Caterpillar, Inc., David Harn, Karen Woods (Bunck, Stacy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, MO County, case number 1616-CV05598, filed by Stacy M Bunck on behalf of All Defendants. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 25R3A2KH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet CIvil Cover Sheet)(Bunck, Stacy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.