Peterson v. Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC
| Danielle Peterson |
| Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC |
| 4:2023cv00057 |
| January 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Roseann Ketchmark |
| Jill A Morris |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Alan L. Rupe on behalf of Defendant Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC.(Rupe, Alan)
|
|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Conference set for 1/9/2024 at 10:30 AM by teleconference before District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. Signed on 3/24/2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Skelton, Sara)
|
|
Filing 13
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Garrett Mark Hodes on behalf of Plaintiff Danielle Peterson.(Hodes, Garrett)
|
|
Filing 12
Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Danielle Peterson. (Hodes, Garrett)
|
|
Filing 11
DESIGNATION OF MEDIATOR naming Robert Schieber(Hodes, Garrett)
|
|
Filing 10
DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Alan L. Rupe on behalf of Defendant Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC.(Rupe, Alan)
|
|
Filing 9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by All Plaintiffs of Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents to Defendant filed by Garrett Mark Hodes on behalf of Plaintiff Danielle Peterson.(Hodes, Garrett)
|
|
Filing 8
RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 3/25/2023. Proposed scheduling order due by 4/8/2023. Signed on February 23, 2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Wheeler, LaTandra)
|
|
Filing 7
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, on behalf of Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC.(Rupe, Alan)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of appearance by Christal Marie Wang on behalf of Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC (Attorney Christal Marie Wang added to party Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC(pty:dft))(Wang, Christal)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of appearance by Alan L. Rupe on behalf of Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC (Attorney Alan L. Rupe added to party Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC(pty:dft))(Rupe, Alan)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT from Magistrate Judge Jill A. Morris to District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. Please note the new case number: 23-0057-CV-W-RK. (Melvin, Greg)
|
|
Filing 3
RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by All Plaintiffs. Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC served on 1/31/2023, answer due 2/21/2023. (Hodes, Garrett)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
|
|
NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to Plaintiff: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 2/17/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Woods, Gloria)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC. (Woods, Gloria)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Jacob Rieger & Company, LLC filed by Garrett Mark Hodes on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8297198. Service due by 4/26/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Hodes, Garrett)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
