Volf v. R. J. O'Brien & Associates
||Lawrence Joseph Volf
||R. J. O'Brien & Associates
||January 8, 2008
||Nebraska District Court
||4 Lincoln Office
||David L. Piester
|Nature of Suit:
||Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 15, 2008
ORDER-Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of this order, the parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) with the clerk of the court (and provide a copy to the magistrate judge and to United States District Judge Richard G. Kopf, the trial judge to whom this case is assigned), together with submitting to the trial judge a draft order which will fully dispose of the case; Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice; This case is removed from the court's trial docket upon representation by the parties that the case has settled. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKL)
|October 16, 2008
ORDER regarding 36 Joint MOTION to Extend Time to File a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal. IT IS ORDERED that the parties' joint motion for an enlargement of time (filing 36 ) is granted, and the courts order of September 15, 2008 (filing 35 ), is modified to provide that the parties shall have until November 1, 2008, to file a joint stipulation for dismissal. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKL)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.