Stafford v. Koehler
| Michael S. Stafford |
| Teresa Koehler |
| 4:2008cv03010 |
| January 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Johnson |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION - The defendant's amended motion for summary judgment 50 is granted. Koehler is entitled to qualified immunity and the claims against her in her individual capacity will be dismissed. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(KBJ)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 39 Motion for Leave to file dispositive motion out of time. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel and motion for reconsideration 33 and 40 are denied. The order setting schedule for progression of a case is modified as indi cated in this order. The final pretrial conference will be before Judge Kopf on 12/29/09 at 12:00 noon in Lincoln, Nebraska. The Clerk is directed to set a pro se case management deadline: pretrial conference before Judge Kopf to be held on 12/29/09. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant's motion to dismiss 22 is denied. Defendant shall file an answer within 10 days in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A). Plaintiff's motion to have defendant evaluated by a professional 29 is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KBJ)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant's motion for leave to file out of time 21 is granted. The motion to dismiss 22 is deemed timely filed. Plaintiff's motions for default judgment 17 and 19 are denied. Plaintiff's motion for de fendant to forward all motions 25 is granted. Defendant shall immediately send a copy of the motion to dismiss and brief in support to plaintiff at his last known address. Plaintiff shall have until February 2, 2009, to file a response to the mot ion to dismiss. In the event that plaintiff fails to file a response by that date, the Court will rule on the motion to dismiss without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: February 2, 2009: motion to dismiss ready for decision. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KBJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stafford v. Koehler | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael S. Stafford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Teresa Koehler | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
