Remmen et al v. City of Ashland et al
Plaintiff: ashland salvage, inc. and Arlo W. Remmen
Defendant: city of ashland, Saunders County Nebraska, State of Nebraska Department of Roads, state of nebraska department of environmental quality, John Craig, Michael J. Linder, John Does and Jane Does
Case Number: 4:2009cv03028
Filed: February 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Saunders
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: David L. Piester
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendants' motions to dismiss (filings 29 , and 39 ) are granted in part and denied in part. This action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In all other respects, the motions are denied without prejudice. Final judgment shall be entered by separate document. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
August 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for an enlargement of time (filing 59 ) is granted, as follows: Plaintiff shall have until August 13, 2009, to respond to Defendants' motions to dismiss (filings 29 , 39 ). Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
July 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER - Plaintiffs' motions for an enlargement of time (filing nos. 49 , 53 ) are granted, as follows: 1. Plaintiffs shall have until August 10, 2009, to respond to Defendants' motions to dismiss (filing nos. 29 , 39 ). 2. Defendants shall have until August 31, 2009, to reply. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
July 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER - 1) The unopposed motions to stay discovery filed by defendants John Craig, Michael J. Linder, State of Nebraska Department of Roads, and State of Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality, (filing no. 47 ), and by defendant Saunders Count y, Nebraska, (filing no. 50 ), are granted. 2) Discovery is stayed pending a ruling on the motions to dismiss filed by the state defendants (filing no. 29 ), and Saunders County, (filing no. 39 ). 3) The parties obligation to meet and confer, and to prepare and file a Rule 26(f) Report of Parties Planning Conference is continued, and the Rule 26(f) Report shall be filed within fourteen calendar days after the court rules on the pending motions to dismiss. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Remmen et al v. City of Ashland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: city of ashland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Saunders County Nebraska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Nebraska Department of Roads
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: state of nebraska department of environmental quality
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Craig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Linder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ashland salvage, inc.
Represented By: Terry K. Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arlo W. Remmen
Represented By: Terry K. Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?