Hoover v. State of Nebraska et al
Mike Hoover |
State of Nebraska, Amy Archuleta and Carlos Castillo |
4:2012cv03197 |
September 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
4 Lincoln Office |
Laurie Smith Camp |
F.A. Gossett |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 18 ), filed by Defendants, the State of Nebraska through the Nebraska Department of Administrative Services, Amy Archuleta, and Carlos Castillo (collectively "Defendants" ;) is granted; Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice; The Defendants' Motion to Strike and Objections to Plaintiff's Exhibits (Filing No. 33 ) are overruled as moot; and A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (MKR) |
Filing 37 ORDER - The Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record (filing 36 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall terminate Ryan Gilbride's appearance as counsel for Defendants and shall terminate future notices to Mr. Gilbride in this action. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (AOA) |
Filing 17 ORDER - The Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record (filing 16 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall terminate Kari Anne Frye Scheer as counsel of record for Defendants and shall terminate future notices to her in this action. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (AOA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.