De La Rosa v. White
||Trooper Mark White
||Raul De La Rosa
||March 18, 2014
||Nebraska District Court
||4 Lincoln Office
||Thomas D. Thalken
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 28, 2014
ORDER-Plaintiff, Raul De La Rosa, is given until November 28, 2014 to show cause why the court should not dismiss the plaintiffs claims for want of prosecution. Failure to timely comply with this order may result in dismissal of the claims filed by the Plaintiff without further notice. Show Cause Deadline set for 11/28/2014.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)
|November 24, 2014
ORDER- The plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (filing 19 ) is granted. The plaintiff may file his response to the defendant's motion for summary judgment on or before January 5, 2015. The defendant may reply in support of his motion for summary judgment on or before January 15, 2015. The pretrial conference scheduled for January 13, 2015 and trial set to begin on January 27, 2015 are continued until further order of the Court. A telephonic conference with United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart will be held on December 3, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. to discuss further case progression. Counsel for plaintiff shall place the call. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.