Garrett, et al v. State of Illinois et al
| Johnny Garrett |
| State of Illinois, People of the State of Illinois-Defendants and Attorney General-Respondent |
| United States of America |
| 4:2014cv03145 |
| July 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is dismissed for want of prosecution. A separate Judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this ma tter without further notice. The clerk's office is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. The clerk's office is directed to request an inmate trust account statement from Plaintiff's institution. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 8/25/2014: Check for MIFP or payment) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party with form AO240) (MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
