Hansen v. Marr
| Richard Otto Hansen |
| James Marr |
| 8:2008cv00444 |
| October 6, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Nuckolls |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Pro Se Docket |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner is granted leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability (filing no. 15 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion before the Eighth Circuit. The Clerk of the court shall provide the Court of Appeals with a copy of this Memorandum and Order. Respondent's Motion to Amend Findings (filing no. 16 ) is denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and sent electronically to the Eighth Circuit)(GJG, )
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding MOTION for Issuance of Certificate of Appealability 15 filed by Richard Otto Hansen. - 1. Petitioner shall have until February 25, 2009 to file a notice of appeal. 2. In the event that Petitioner fails to file a notice of appeal by February 25, 2009, the Request for Certificate of Appealability will be denied without further notice. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner Richard Otto Hansen's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing no. 1 ) is denied in all respects and this action is dismissed with prejudice. 2. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKH)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing no. 1 ), the court preliminarily determines that all three of Petitioner's claims, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizabl e in federal court. Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (filing no. 4 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion. The Clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this Memorandum and Order and the Petition for Writ of Habeas C orpus (filing no. 1 ) to Respondent and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-classmail. By December 5, 2008, Respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or an answer. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro secase management deadline in this case using the following text: December 5, 2008: deadline for Respondent to file answer or motion for summary judgment. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed)(GJG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hansen v. Marr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Richard Otto Hansen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: James Marr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
