Creighton University v. General Electric Company
| Creighton University |
| General Electric Company |
| 8:2008cv00460 |
| October 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Douglas |
| David L. Piester |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the parties' joint stipulation (filing 64 ) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER - I was informed today by one of the lawyers that the mediation in this case was likely successful and, as a result, the parties wish to cancel the telephone scheduling conference. With that in mind, IT IS ORDERED that 1. The telephone scheduling conference is cancelled; 2. By the close of business on Monday, September 14, 2009, counsel for all parties shall file and serve a status report. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (filing no. 46 -1) is granted in part and denied in part, as follows: 1. The plaintiff is denied leave to amend: a. to allege that it is entitled to recover as damages $2.4 million in uncollected claims; and b. to allege that the damages disclaimer contained in paragraph 27 of the contract is unconscionable. 2. In all other respects the motion is granted. 3. The plaintiff shall modify the proposed ame nded complaint (filing no. 46 -2) to comply with this memorandum and order, and shall file the same on or before July 24, 2009. 4. The defendant shall respond to the filed amended complaint on or before August 17, 2009. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER. In Magistrate Judge Piester's absence,IT IS ORDERED that the telephone planning conference in this matter will be held with Judge Kopf on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, at 9:00 AM for the purpose of reviewing the preparation of the case to date and the scheduling of the case to trial. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the call.Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, )
|
|
Filing
32
STRICKEN - MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 21 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and denying 26 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKH) Modified on 3/18/2009 to strike pursuant text strike order 33 (GJG).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Creighton University v. General Electric Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Creighton University | |
| Represented By: | Michaela A. Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: General Electric Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
