United States of America v. Brooks

United States of America v. Brooks

Plaintiff:	United States of America
Defendant:	Jeffery D. Brooks
Case Number:	8:2009cv00087
Filed:	March 12, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	Forfeit/Penalty: Agriculture Office
County:	Red Willow
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge:	F. A. Gossett
Presiding Judge:	Laurie Smith Camp
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By:	28:1345 Recovery of Debt to US

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 13, 2010	Filing 24 ORDER regarding 10/7/2010 Hearing 22 . Due to the defendant's unexcused and unexplained failure to appear before the undersigned on 10/7/2010, a warrant shall be issued by the Clerk of Court directing the United States Marshal to apprehend the defendant, Jeffrey Brooks, and bring the defendant before this court to show cause why it should not be the recommendation of the this court that Jeffrey Brooks be held in contempt and punished therefor. ( Case Management Deadline set for 10/20/2010.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (CLS, ) Modified on 10/13/2010 (CLS, ).
May 25, 2010	Filing 16 ORDER granting 14 Motion to Compel answers to Interrogatories as follows: 1. Jeffrey Brooks shall answer each of the plaintiff's "INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS BY JUDGMENT CREDITOR UNITED STATES OFAMERICA" no later tha n July 1, 2010. Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the specific reasons for objection must be stated in lieu of an answer. If Jeffrey Brooks does not retain counse l, all answers and objections to the interrogatories shall be signed by Jeffrey Brooks. If Jeffrey Brooks does retain counsel in this matter, all answers shall be signed by Jeffrey Brooks andany objections shall be signed by the attorney making the o bjections. 2. If Jeffrey Brooks raises a frivolous objection to any of the interrogatories or fails to provide a timely, complete, truthful, and non-evasive response to each interrogatory, the court will entertain a motion for leave to institute civ il or criminal contempt proceedings against Jeffrey Brooks pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(e), a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.37 for costs and sanctions, or any other appropriate request for relief.3. Moving counsel shall serve a copy of this Order by mail, return receipt requested,on the defendant, Jeffrey Brooks. Moving counsel shall file a Certificate of Service listingthe names and addresses of the persons to whom notice was sent. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (PCV, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 13, 2010

Filing 24 ORDER regarding 10/7/2010 Hearing 22 . Due to the defendant's unexcused and unexplained failure to appear before the undersigned on 10/7/2010, a warrant shall be issued by the Clerk of Court directing the United States Marshal to apprehend the defendant, Jeffrey Brooks, and bring the defendant before this court to show cause why it should not be the recommendation of the this court that Jeffrey Brooks be held in contempt and punished therefor. ( Case Management Deadline set for 10/20/2010.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (CLS, ) Modified on 10/13/2010 (CLS, ).

May 25, 2010

Filing 16 ORDER granting 14 Motion to Compel answers to Interrogatories as follows: 1. Jeffrey Brooks shall answer each of the plaintiff's "INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS BY JUDGMENT CREDITOR UNITED STATES OFAMERICA" no later tha n July 1, 2010. Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the specific reasons for objection must be stated in lieu of an answer. If Jeffrey Brooks does not retain counse l, all answers and objections to the interrogatories shall be signed by Jeffrey Brooks. If Jeffrey Brooks does retain counsel in this matter, all answers shall be signed by Jeffrey Brooks andany objections shall be signed by the attorney making the o bjections. 2. If Jeffrey Brooks raises a frivolous objection to any of the interrogatories or fails to provide a timely, complete, truthful, and non-evasive response to each interrogatory, the court will entertain a motion for leave to institute civ il or criminal contempt proceedings against Jeffrey Brooks pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(e), a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.37 for costs and sanctions, or any other appropriate request for relief.3. Moving counsel shall serve a copy of this Order by mail, return receipt requested,on the defendant, Jeffrey Brooks. Moving counsel shall file a Certificate of Service listingthe names and addresses of the persons to whom notice was sent. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (PCV, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Brooks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By:	Office of General Counsel USDA - Farm Service Agen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffery D. Brooks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?