Sundberg v. State of Nebraska
| Carl Sundberg, Jr. |
| State of Nebraska |
| 8:2009cv00228 |
| July 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Douglas |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| David L. Piester |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the court's Memorandum and Order entered on September 11, 2009, (filing no. 11 , Judgment of dismissal with prejudice is entered in favor of the defendant State of Nebraska, and Does 1-5 in their official capacities, on p laintiff's constitutional claims. Judgment of dismissal without prejudice is entered in favor of the defendant State of Nebraska, and Does 1-5 in their official capacities, on plaintiff's negligence claims. Pursuant to the court's Memorandum and Order entered this date, (filing no. 13 ), judgment of dismissal without prejudice is entered in favor of defendant Does 1-5 in their individual capacities. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is given until November 23, 2009 to show cause why his claims against Does 1-5 should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution, in the absence of which plaintiff's claims against these defendants will be dismissed without further notice, and a final judgment will be entered in this case. Show Cause Deadline set for 11/23/2009.Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendant State of Nebraska's motion to dismiss (filing 5 ) is granted in all respects. The dismissal of the plaintiff's constitutional claims is with prejudice. The dismissal of the plaintiffs negligence claim is without prejudice to refiling in state court. This order does not constitute a final judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for an enlargement of time (filing 8 ) is granted, as follows: Plaintiff shall have until August 14, 2009, to respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss (filing 5 ). Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sundberg v. State of Nebraska | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carl Sundberg, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Fitzpatrick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of Nebraska | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
