Hill v. Antioch Company
| Beverly J. Hill |
| Antioch Company |
| 8:2009cv00275 |
| August 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Sarpy |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION- The arbitration provision in the Consultant Agreement is not unconscionable, and there is an enforceable agreement to arbitrate between Hill and defendant. Busy Scrappin was not a signatory to the Consultant Agreement, and defenda nt has not sufficiently identified any basis for binding Busy Scrappin to the arbitration provision in the Consultant Agreement as a nonsignatory. Therefore, there is no agreement to arbitrate between Busy Scrappin and defendant. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER OF RECUSAL AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT- On the court's own motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455(a). Upon review of the parties and the record in the above-designated case, the undersigned judge shall, and hereby does, recuse himself from the above-designated case. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 16 Motion for Leave. The plaintiffs may file their Brief and Index of Evidence in Support of Motion to Stay or Dismiss Arbitration.The plaintiffs may respond to the defendants Brief in Opposition on or beforeSeptember 9, 2009. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (PCV, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hill v. Antioch Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Beverly J. Hill | |
| Represented By: | Tara A. Stingley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Antioch Company | |
| Represented By: | William J. Birkel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
