Red Kettle v. United States of America
| Byron K. Red Kettle |
| United States of America |
| 8:2011cv00264 |
| August 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; Petitioner Byron K. Red Kettle's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing no. 1) is dismissed with prejudice. All other pending motions are denied. In accordance with this Memorandum and Order, the Clerk of the court is directed to terminate "The United States of America" as a Respondent in this matter. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(ADB)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Petitioner's Motion for Production 19 is denied. Respondents' Objection 20 is granted. Petitioner's Motions to Appoint Counsel 15 and 17 are denied. Respondents' Objection 16 is granted. Petiti oner's Motion to Extend Time 18 is granted. Petitioner shall have until December 21, 2011, to file a brief in response to the pending Motion for Summary Judgment. In the event that Petitioner does not file a brief by that date, the court will rule on the Motion for Summary Judgment. In the event that Petitioner does file a brief by that date, Respondents shall have 30 days after the filing of the brief in which to file a reply brief. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: December 21, 2011: deadline for Petitioner to file response to motion for summary judgment. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the Petition (filing no. 1 ), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claim, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, is potentially cognizable in federal court. The Clerk of the cour t is directed to mail copies of this Memorandum and Order and the Petition to Respondents and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. By November 14, 2011, Respondents shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court record s in support of an answer. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: November 14, 2011: deadline for Respondents to file state court records in support of answer or motion for s ummary judgment. If Respondents elect to file an answer, the procedures in this order shall be followed by Respondents and Petitioner. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 14, 2011: check for Respondents to file answer and separate brief. Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (filing no. 4 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion. Petitioner's Motions to Amend (filing nos. 8 and 9 ) are gran ted. The Clerk of the court is directed to add Robert Houston as a Respondent in this matter. Petitioner's Motion for Enlargement of Custody Status (filing no. 6 ) is denied.Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party and to Nebraska Attorney General)(GJG)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER provisionally granting the 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Petitioner will not be required to pay the $5.00 fee at this time. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Red Kettle v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Byron K. Red Kettle | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
