Eastern Nebraska Human Services Agency v. United States of America
Eastern Nebraska Human Services Agency |
United States of America |
8:2012cv00053 |
February 8, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
F.A. Gossett |
Taxes |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 JUDGMENT - Upon the parties' joint stipulation for dismissal (filing 25 ), this matter is dismissed with prejudice, the parties to bear their respective costs, including any possible attorney fees or other expenses of litigation. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (JAB) |
Filing 24 ORDER - The defendant's motion to dismiss (filing 20 ) is held in abeyance until further notice. The parties are directed to inform the Court every sixty days of the status of the case. (Initial Status Report due by 9/24/2012.) Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (TEL) |
Filing 22 ORDER - The plaintiff shall show cause, by an appropriate filing on or before July 23, 2012, why this case should not be dismissed. The plaintiff's failure to file a timely response to this order will result in the case being dismissed without further notice. Should the plaintiff file a response, the defendant may file a reply in support of its motion to dismiss on or before August 6, 2012. (Show Cause Deadline set for 7/23/2012.) Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (TEL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.