Corona v. Douglas County Department of Corrections et al
| Pedro Camacho Corona |
| Douglas County Department of Corrections |
| Doctor of Douglas Co. Department of Corrections and Nebraska Medical Center's Surgeon |
| Nurses of Douglas Co. Department of Corrections |
| 8:2012cv00301 |
| August 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION - The October 14, 2012, deadline has passed and plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee. In addition, he has not asked for an extension of time in which to do so. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss plaintiff's case for failure to comply with the Court's September 14, 2012, memorandum and Order. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff Pedro Camacho Corona shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $44.63 by 10/14/2012, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written motion. Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 10/14/2012: initial partial filing fee payment due. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
