Hancoch v. Foxall et al
| Anthony Hancoch |
| Jane Doe, Dr. Foxall and Mental Illness |
| 8:2012cv00385 |
| October 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM OPINION on the Court's own motion. The plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court warned plaintiff that failure to comply by December 14, 2012, would result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff did not respond. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the complaint on or before December 14, 2012. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notic e. The clerk of the court is directed to send to plaintiff the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. application. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines:deadline for payment or filing of IFP ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 12/14/2012.) Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party with form AO240) (MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
